It will all make sense with time and in some ways is superior to GH. Over at you'll find the vvvv forums, which are very active and if you pose your question there or even look for stuff on there, you will find things that will be very close to what you are trying to achieve, because its one of the classic use-cases for vvvv.ĭon't be put off by vvvv's minimalistic user-interface. If for some reason you want to control GH from vvvv (and send data back), that is possible using OSC, which even works over the network if necessary. I know Resolume works on Windows and you can run vvvv Patches directly inside it using a framework called Sprout (similar to Syphon). Obviously Syphon/Modul8/Madmapper only work on the Mac and GH only on Windows, so getting live-video from one to the other will be a bit of a challange. Works well with multiple outputs, for example using Matrox Triple Head 2 Go. VVVV is totally geared towards realtime performance and can be made to do pretty much anything you can think of. The same basic principles apply there and if you are comfortable in one, you will get the hang of the other quickly. Its an amazing toolset and works very similar to Grasshopper. The performance is not geared towards real-time performance and visual output is pretty restricted. I have a bit of experience in this and would probably not go with GH even though it might be tempting.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |